Case Law

A Venezuelan woman had her asylum grant vacated in September 2026 after the Board of Immigration Appeals ruled that Nicolás Maduro's removal from power is a legally significant change in country conditions. The ruling sets a binding precedent: immigration judges must now weigh Maduro's fall — and the US-backed Interim Government — when deciding whether a Venezuelan applicant still faces a real personal risk. For thousands of Venezuelans with pending asylum cases, the stakes just shifted.

Angel Trigueros Quizar arrived at immigration court five minutes late because of a flat tire. That was enough for a judge to order him deported — without ever hearing his asylum case. In September 2026, a federal appeals court said the system got it wrong.

If your baby was born in the US and you are not a citizen or permanent resident, you may be wondering whether your child is still protected after Trump signed a new executive order in August 2026. The answer, for now, is yes. On September 3, 2026, U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman blocked that order, writing that the Supreme Court had already decided this question — and the president must follow it.

Your attorney just finished arguing for your life in a federal courtroom — and then the judge told the jury to forget everything they heard. On September 3, 2026, the Fourth Circuit ruled that is exactly the kind of error that can undo a conviction. The court vacated the murder conviction of one MS-13 defendant while affirming the convictions of his two co-defendants, drawing a clear line on when a judge goes too far.

You volunteered to watch an immigration court hearing — and the judge's clerk told you the hearing was online, with no link for the public. A federal court in Washington, D.C., ruled in September 2026 that this kind of lockout may break federal law. The decision does not force the government to change anything yet, but it keeps a major lawsuit alive — and puts immigration courts on notice.

Ifeanyi Emmanuel Diji found out he had a deportation order only when he showed up for his green card interview in 2025 — two years after an immigration judge had already ordered him removed. He never knew about the hearing. Under a rule that stood for 25 years, that might have saved him. Today, the BIA erased that rule.

Every state agency in the country may now be required to report undocumented immigrants to federal authorities — not just welfare offices. The Department of Justice issued that legal opinion on September 1, 2026, reversing a nearly 30-year-old interpretation. For millions of undocumented people, routine contact with any state office just became riskier.

B.P. helped the DEA convict cartel members inside the United States. He served time, cooperated fully, and then fought for years to avoid being sent back to Guatemala, where he said the cartel would kill him. On September 2, 2026, the Eighth Circuit ended his federal appeal — not because his fear was wrong, but because of a deadline he missed nearly five years ago.

Noncitizens were transferred from US custody into Salvadoran prisons, cut off from lawyers, and held in harsh conditions. A coalition of legal organizations sued to stop it. In September 2026, a federal judge refused to reopen the case — and the reason matters for anyone trying to challenge US deportation policy in court.

Your immigration lawyer filed paperwork saying you entered the US illegally — but that was wrong. A federal court ruled in September 2026 that you have the right to testify and correct that mistake. For thousands of people in removal proceedings, this decision could change everything.

A US appeals court threw out a civil forfeiture order in September 2026, ruling that federal courts cannot seize foreign bank accounts without first proving they actually control the assets. The Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. Nasri sets a constitutional limit on how far US courts can reach into overseas finances. For anyone with foreign assets caught up in a US legal action, the ruling changes the rules of the game.

A federal appeals court ruled in September 2026 that the US can legally ban nonimmigrant visa holders from owning or possessing guns. The Third Circuit upheld a 24-month prison sentence against a Salvadoran man living in the US on a temporary work visa — and the ruling now sets binding law across three states. If you are in the US on a temporary visa, this decision directly affects you.

You have a removal order from years ago, but a new court ruling seems to change everything — so you file to reopen your case. Jose Aristy-Rosa tried that four times over 15 years, and in September 2026 the Third Circuit shut it down for good. The court's reasoning sets a hard limit that affects anyone trying to fight deportation based on a change in the law.

Maria Reynoso-Salgado lived in the United States for nearly 30 years. A guilty plea to a single misdemeanor — child neglect — cost her the right to fight her deportation. In September 2026, the Seventh Circuit upheld that result, and the reasoning affects anyone with a past conviction who is hoping to stay in this country.

A Salvadoran father argued that his son's asthma — including two hospital visits and daily medication — was reason enough to stop his deportation. The First Circuit disagreed in September 2026. The reason matters for anyone in removal proceedings who plans to use a child's health as the centerpiece of their case.