Court Blocks ICE Biometrics Ban for Detained Applicants
You are detained by ICE, your green card or T visa application is pending, and USCIS has stopped collecting your fingerprints — so your case is frozen and deportation looms. In October 2026, a federal court in Washington, D.C., ruled that a DHS policy halting biometrics collection for detained USCIS applicants likely violates federal law, and ordered the government to restore the old system while the lawsuit proceeds.

You filed your green card or T visa application months ago. Then ICE detained you — and suddenly USCIS stopped scheduling your biometrics appointment. Without fingerprints, your application stalls. Without a completed application, you stay detained. A federal court in Washington, D.C., ruled in October 2026 that this cycle likely violates federal law, and ordered the government to stop enforcing the policy while the case continues.
What the court found
In December 2025, the Department of Homeland Security announced it would no longer collect fingerprints, photographs, or signatures from people in ICE custody who have pending USCIS applications — unless those applications were filed with an immigration court (the Executive Office for Immigration Review). That left out people applying for green cards (permanent residency), special immigrant juvenile status for abused or neglected children, T visas for human trafficking survivors, U visas for crime survivors, and asylum for relatives of people already granted asylum. USCIS requires biometrics for all of these. Miss your biometrics appointment, and USCIS treats your application as abandoned and denies it. ICE also stopped transporting detained people to their appointments, which it had previously done as a matter of policy.
Immigration Deadlines 2026 — Free
Download PDF with all key dates
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, in Civil Action No. 26-01510, found that the plaintiffs — detained immigrants with pending USCIS applications — are likely to succeed in showing the policy is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the federal law that governs how agencies must make rules. The court found DHS adopted the policy without a reasoned explanation and without going through the required public notice-and-comment process. The court also noted a concrete harm: for T visa and U visa applicants, completing biometrics can trigger a "bona fide" determination that automatically pauses a deportation order — even before USCIS decides the full application. Blocking biometrics collection removes that protection entirely.
The court granted a stay under Section 705 of the APA, which temporarily restores the old policy: ICE must again collect biometrics for detained people with pending USCIS applications. The court declined to issue a broader preliminary injunction covering a class of all similarly situated detainees, finding the stay sufficient at this stage. The government has not explained the circumstances under which it would or would not agree to collect biometrics on a case-by-case basis, which the court found troubling.
What to do
- If you or a family member is detained by ICE and has a pending USCIS application — for a green card, T visa, U visa, special immigrant juvenile status, or derivative asylum — contact an immigration attorney immediately. The court's stay means DHS must resume collecting biometrics, but you may need to take steps to reschedule a missed appointment.
- If USCIS denied your application as "abandoned" because you missed a biometrics appointment while detained, ask an attorney about filing a motion to reopen (a formal request to reconsider a closed case) based on this court ruling.
- Gather documentation showing you were in ICE custody on the date of your missed biometrics appointment. This record will support any request to reschedule or reopen your case.
- Follow updates on Civil Action No. 26-01510 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia — the stay is temporary and the case is ongoing.
What to do, step by step — see our guide “Your Rights During an ICE Encounter”.

Fishkin Law Firm, New York
This stay is significant because it restores a concrete procedural right: ICE must transport detained applicants to biometrics appointments, which for T and U visa applicants can trigger an automatic pause on a removal order even before USCIS decides the case. If your application was denied as abandoned while you were detained under this policy, you have grounds to file a motion to reopen — courts generally recognize that missing a government-scheduled appointment due to government-caused detention is not voluntary abandonment. Do not wait; motions to reopen have strict deadlines, and an immigration attorney can assess your specific situation.
Frequently Asked Questions
My USCIS application was denied as 'abandoned' because I missed my biometrics appointment while in ICE detention. Can I reopen it?
Possibly yes. The court's ruling found the biometrics ban likely illegal, and missing an appointment because ICE refused to transport you is not the same as voluntarily skipping it. An immigration attorney can file a motion to reopen your case and cite the court's October 2026 stay order as support. Act quickly — motions to reopen have time limits.
Does this court ruling apply to me if I am detained and have a pending green card application?
The stay covers people detained by ICE who have pending USCIS applications that require biometrics, including green card (adjustment of status) applications, T visas, U visas, special immigrant juvenile status, and derivative asylum. If you fit that description, the government is now required to collect your biometrics under the court's order.
How does completing biometrics help stop my deportation?
For T visa and U visa applicants, completing biometrics allows USCIS to run background checks and issue a 'bona fide' determination. Under federal regulations, a bona fide T visa determination automatically pauses any final deportation order. A bona fide U visa determination can lead to deferred action, which may pause removal proceedings. Without biometrics, USCIS cannot make that determination.
Is this court order permanent?
No. The court issued a temporary stay under Section 705 of the Administrative Procedure Act, which pauses the DHS policy while the lawsuit continues. The case — Civil Action No. 26-01510 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia — is still ongoing, and the government could appeal or the court could modify the order as the case develops.