DHS Spied on Anti-ICE Protesters and Unions in Minnesota
You went to a free training at a public library to learn about peaceful protest. You had no idea a DHS undercover agent was there, recording audio and handing out his phone number. Newly released court records show that is exactly what happened to activists in Minneapolis — and the surveillance went far deeper than one library meeting.

You showed up to a public meeting at your local library to learn about your rights during an ICE arrest. You had no idea a federal undercover agent was in the room — recording audio, chatting with attendees, and handing out a phone number. That is exactly what newly released court records describe happening in Minneapolis in early 2026.
Nearly 30 internal DHS investigative reports were filed in federal court in connection with a criminal case the Department of Justice brought against 15 Minneapolis protesters. The documents, submitted by defense attorney Kevin Riach, reveal that DHS launched a program called "Operation Puppet Master" in January 2026. The goal: identify a "network of conspirators" organizing against ICE. Undercover agents attended open community meetings at libraries, churches, and parks. They joined private Signal group chats used by activists. DHS also used administrative subpoenas — which do not require a judge's approval — to pull financial records from major national unions, including the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the Communications Workers of America, as well as the nonprofit Sunrise Movement.
Immigration Policy Checklist — Free
DACA, TPS, Executive Orders: what to monitor
None of the organizations whose records were obtained have been charged with any crime. The 94-page federal indictment against the 15 defendants contains no allegations that any of them injured a specific ICE officer, and no charges of serious violence. Still, the government framed the investigation as targeting "domestic terrorist financing" and a conspiracy to "impede" immigration officers. Mike German, a former FBI undercover agent and civil liberties advocate, told reporters the government appeared to be using "guilt by association" logic rather than focusing on specific alleged criminal acts. "You're talking about meetings that are open to the public," German said. "It's hardly a challenge to 'infiltrate' this kind of meeting, and that should be a clue this isn't a criminal group."
For immigrants and their supporters, the records raise a direct question: can attending a community meeting, joining an activist chat group, or donating to a union create legal risk? Civil rights attorneys argue the First Amendment protects all of those activities. But the documents show the government treated them as evidence of conspiracy. Emilia Gonzalez Avalos, executive director of Unidos MN — a Minneapolis nonprofit mentioned in the files — said the operation was "a clear attempt to intimidate us, to punish and politically repress disagreement."
What to do if you attend community or activist events
- Know your rights at public meetings: you have the right to remain silent if approached by law enforcement. You do not have to answer questions about who organized the event or who else attended.
- If you are contacted by someone who claims to be a fellow activist but asks about "direct action" or suggests illegal activity, do not engage — and tell the organizer. This matches the behavior described in the DHS reports.
- If you receive a subpoena for financial or communication records, contact an immigration or civil rights attorney immediately before responding. Administrative subpoenas do not require a judge's order, but you may still have legal options to challenge them.
- If you are an immigrant and you are named in any federal investigation — even as a witness — consult an immigration lawyer before speaking to any federal agent. Statements made to DHS agents can affect your green card application, asylum case, or removal proceedings.

Fishkin Law Firm, New York
These records are a serious warning for any immigrant who attends community organizing events. Even lawful activity — donating to a union, joining a Signal group, attending a public meeting — can end up in a federal investigative file, and that file can be used in immigration proceedings against you. If DHS or any federal agent contacts you, you have the right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney present; exercise both before you say a word. Anyone named in or connected to these investigations should consult an immigration attorney to assess whether their visa status, green card application, or asylum case could be affected.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can attending an anti-ICE protest hurt my green card application or asylum case?
Attending a lawful protest is protected by the First Amendment and should not, by itself, affect your immigration case. However, these records show DHS has used attendance at public meetings as part of broader conspiracy investigations. If your name appears in any federal investigative file, it could come up during background checks for a green card or asylum application. Talk to an immigration lawyer if you are concerned.
Can DHS get my bank records or messages without a court order?
Yes, in some cases. The records show DHS used administrative subpoenas — which do not require a judge's approval — to obtain financial records from unions and nonprofits. This is a legal but controversial tool. If you receive a subpoena, contact an attorney before responding; you may have grounds to challenge it.
What should I do if I think an undercover agent attended a meeting I was at?
Do not panic. Attending a public meeting is not a crime. Do not try to identify or confront anyone you suspect. Tell the event organizer. If you are an immigrant and you are worried about how your attendance could be interpreted, speak with an immigration attorney who can review your specific situation.
Are the 15 protesters who were charged convicted of anything?
As of the information available in these records, the case filed in June 2026 is ongoing. The defendants have been charged but not convicted. The 94-page indictment contains no allegations that any defendant injured a specific ICE officer and no charges of serious violence.