All news

Your grocery store may already have a scan of your face — and your landlord might too. In New York City, businesses and residential buildings are quietly collecting biometric data, including facial images, and their privacy policies allow them to share it with law enforcement. For immigrants worried about ICE, that is not a hypothetical threat.

Federal officials have quietly force-fed at least three immigrants held in ICE detention — and attempted the procedure on at least ten — according to a Guardian investigation published in 2026. The procedures, which human rights groups call torture, were carried out inside privately run detention centers with little public notice. Many of the people subjected to them had no lawyer.

What if your legal status ended overnight — and you had no idea what comes next? That's the reality for thousands of Haitian immigrants in New York right now, after Temporary Protected Status (TPS) — a program that let them live and work legally in the US — expired. At the same time, two immigrants died in ICE custody this week, and immigration courts are moving faster than ever.

You are released from federal custody in February, in Pittsburgh, wearing summer clothes, with a dead phone and no way home. That is what happened to Daphy Michel — and three days later, she was found dying on the ground at a bus stop. Now her family is preparing to sue the US government.

You are released from jail after six months. Criminal charges dropped. Your family is waiting for a call so they can pick you up. That call never comes — and three days later, you are found frozen at a bus stop, alone in a city you don't know. That is what happened to Daphy Michel, 31, a Haitian immigrant in Pennsylvania who had an asylum hearing scheduled and a family who loved her. In June 2026, the county medical examiner ruled her death a homicide.

A small Texas border town took on the federal government in August 2026. The Presidio Municipal Development District filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security, challenging deportation policy in one of the most active border regions in the country. The outcome could reshape how local communities fight back against federal immigration enforcement.

Border patrol agents at Dulles airport seized journalist Max Blumenthal's two phones after he returned from Iran — and a federal judge is now demanding proof the government didn't search them. The case is raising alarms about press freedom and the rights of anyone crossing a US border with a phone. If agents can take your device and access your contacts and messages, the consequences go far beyond one reporter.

Martin Martinez-Ballinas has been deported from the United States twice — and is now in ICE custody facing a third removal. The 38-year-old Mexican national was taken from federal prison in New Jersey on July 22, 2026, after serving time for illegal reentry. His case shows exactly how federal law treats people who return to the US after deportation.

What happens to a child in immigration court with no lawyer? Right now, tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors in the US are finding out. The Trump administration stopped paying for their legal representation, and immigration judges are issuing removal orders at four times the rate of Trump's first term.

You're at the airport, boarding pass in hand — and ICE agents are waiting. That scenario is becoming more common across the US, as ICE now uses TSA screening data to identify and arrest immigrants at airports nationwide. At the same time, courts are pushing back on the government's detention policies, and tens of thousands of migrant children may have just lost their only lawyers.

During 33 days of World Cup matches in Atlanta, HSI and more than 20 law enforcement agencies ran a sweeping anti-trafficking operation. They made 153 arrests and reached 54 victims. For immigrants in the city — many of whom trafficking networks specifically target — the operation carries a direct message about both risk and protection.

An immigration court issued a decision in the case In re S.W. on July 31, 2026. Court rulings like this one can shift how judges handle removal proceedings — the legal process used to deport someone. For immigrants currently in immigration court, understanding new decisions can make a real difference.

A federal court decided Rahimzadegan v. Miller on July 31, 2026, issuing a ruling that now sits in the official record of U.S. immigration case law. For immigrants in removal proceedings, new court decisions can shift how judges apply the rules — sometimes in ways that open new paths to stay in the country. This case is one to know.

You filed for asylum, your case was denied, and now you're not sure what comes next. In July 2026, a federal court issued its decision in Obse v. Collins — a ruling that could change how courts review asylum denials. If you are in removal proceedings or already received a denial, this case may open new legal options.

A federal court ruled in July 2026 in Bay Area Unitarian v. Ogg, a case challenging immigration enforcement actions connected to a Bay Area church. The decision sets a legal precedent that could affect how ICE conducts arrests near sensitive locations. For immigrants in removal proceedings, this ruling may open new lines of defense.

You leave for work every morning not knowing if you'll come home. That's the reality for hundreds of thousands of farm workers across the US right now. A new survey from the United Farm Workers Foundation puts hard numbers on fears that many undocumented workers have been living with since the start of 2025.

You watch the news and wonder if anyone powerful is paying attention to what is happening to immigrants in the US. Pope Leo, the first American-born pope, has an answer — and he gave it on live television. He called Trump's immigration policies "inhuman" and pointed to his own immigrant grandparents to explain why he keeps saying it.

What if your immigration lawyer gets fined mid-hearing — and that fine affects your case? The Department of Justice has proposed a new rule that would let immigration judges issue civil money penalties for contempt of court. For anyone in removal proceedings, this changes the stakes inside the courtroom.

What happens when the government wants to deport someone but can't reveal its evidence in open court? For the first time in 30 years, the Justice Department has an answer — and it just used it. On July 15, 2026, the DOJ filed the first-ever case in the Alien Terrorist Removal Court, a secret federal court that has existed since 1996 but never heard a single case. The target: Nazira Haji Zada, 47, of Fort Worth, Texas, accused of helping her son and son-in-law plan an ISIS-inspired mass shooting on Election Day 2024.

At least 52 people have died in ICE custody since the current administration took office. Tens of thousands more are held in facilities where access to lawyers, food, sunlight, and medical care is severely limited. One woman in Arizona, detained for 16 months without proper cancer treatment, has reportedly lost more than 70 pounds and is vomiting blood.