All news

Can you earn money in the US if you don't have a full work permit? The answer depends on your immigration status — and getting it wrong can put your case at risk. Here's what the options actually look like, and what every immigrant should know before taking a job.

A federal court ruling in United States v. Gonzalez has put deportation defense rights back in the spotlight. The case raises urgent questions about what immigrants can and cannot do when ICE comes to the door. If you or someone you know is in removal proceedings, this decision matters.

You showed up to every immigration court hearing and followed every rule — then a federal court issued a ruling that could change everything. The decision in Kim v. Blanche is now part of the legal landscape that judges and USCIS officers must consider. For immigrants in removal proceedings or waiting on a green card, that matters.

What if the agency meant to protect migrant children was quietly helping ICE arrest them — and their families? Internal documents obtained by Reuters show that is exactly what happened. The Office of Refugee Resettlement shared over 460,000 leads with immigration enforcement since January 2025, resulting in more than 12,000 arrests.

ICE agents texted racial slurs about the people they were targeting during the 2025 Los Angeles immigration raids. That detail is now part of a federal lawsuit — and it raises a direct question for anyone who was stopped, detained, or arrested during those operations: was your stop legal?

A federal court ruled in Ohindo v. Ball in July 2026, issuing a decision that touches on deportation defense rights in U.S. immigration proceedings. For immigrants currently in removal proceedings — or those who fear an ICE arrest — court rulings like this one can change what legal options are available to them. The stakes are high: the outcome of cases like this can determine whether someone gets a full hearing before a judge or faces fast-track removal.

You did everything right — and then a government letter arrived saying you could be deported. In July 2026, a federal court took up exactly that kind of fight in Liu v. Noem, a case challenging DHS Secretary Kristi Noem's authority over immigration enforcement. The outcome could affect how removal proceedings work for thousands of people.

What if the facility holding you — or your family member — has no reliable system to provide basic medical care? That is exactly what a court-appointed doctor found at California City, the largest ICE detention center in California. His report, filed in court this week, says the facility is putting detainees at "serious risk of both immediate and long-term harm."

A college professor in St. Paul, Minnesota, was pulled from his car in a belly chain on June 16 — not for violence, but for helping organize a community meeting about ICE. Erik Davis, 53, now faces up to six years in prison. The case is raising urgent questions about whether attending a protest or joining a Signal group chat can be treated as a federal crime.

CBP officers at the Del Rio International Bridge arrested a man on July 15 after a biometric database check flagged a felony warrant — in seconds, at the border. The same check runs on every person who crosses a US port of entry, including immigrants with pending cases or old legal issues. If your record has anything unresolved, officers will see it.

A federal document confirms that ICE forcibly fed, hydrated, and catheterized at least one detained immigrant who went on hunger strike. The document — published by ICE's own health agency — is the first official confirmation of forced medical treatment under the current Trump administration. For thousands of people held in immigration detention across the US, it raises urgent questions about safety and legal rights.

You entered the US on a legal visa, your time ran out, and you stayed. That decision — made by Sebastian Mihai Caraba, a Hungarian-Romanian national who arrived in 2018 — ended with an ICE arrest in Washington, DC, and a federal removal order issued June 22, 2026. His case is a direct warning about what visa overstay consequences look like in 2026.

A federal court issued its ruling in O. v. Helland on July 28, 2026, in a case involving deportation defense and the rights of immigrants facing removal. The decision could affect how immigration officials handle similar cases going forward. For anyone in removal proceedings, understanding what courts say about government authority matters directly to your case.

You submitted your asylum application months ago and were waiting for USCIS to call you in for an interview. That call may never come. Starting today, USCIS can send your case straight to an immigration judge — no interview, no warning — under a rule that took effect July 27, 2026.

You are driving to a routine delivery job when three unmarked vehicles block your truck and masked men with guns rush toward you — and you have no idea they are federal agents. That is exactly what happened to Francisco Longoria in San Bernardino, California. Agents fired three shots at his truck, then arrested him in a pre-dawn raid weeks later — and the felony charge against him was eventually dropped.

A man from Burkina Faso has spent 19 months in U.S. immigration detention — every single day of his time in America — without ever being charged with a crime. A 2025 ICE policy memo eliminated bond hearings for millions of undocumented immigrants, and the detained population has since nearly doubled, from 39,000 to 71,000. The Supreme Court will not weigh in until October 2026, leaving tens of thousands of people in legal limbo right now.

You are Haitian, your TPS just ended, and now federal sources say ICE is drawing up plans to target communities like yours. At the same time, a federal appeals court just blocked a $100,000 H-1B fee that would have shut out thousands of skilled workers. This week's immigration news hits hard — and fast.

A federal court ruled in the case of Neguse v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in July 2026. The decision adds to a line of rulings that define what ICE can and cannot do when arresting and detaining immigrants. If you are in removal proceedings — or fear you could be — this ruling may affect your legal options.

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita sued Berry Global Group Inc. in July 2026 in a case that puts a major U.S. employer's immigration compliance under a legal microscope. For immigrant workers at large companies, an AG lawsuit can trigger audits, re-verification demands, and sudden job loss — even for those with valid work permits. The outcome could affect how aggressively other states pursue similar corporate enforcement actions.

You finish a prison sentence and walk toward the exit — and ICE officers are already there. A July 2026 ICE announcement out of Washington, DC shows exactly how this happens: a detainer filed years earlier, honored by state corrections, leads directly to removal. For anyone with a criminal record and an open immigration case, this is the process you need to understand.