All news

Carmen Zurita handed over $300 in cash to a Queens nonprofit for help with her asylum application — and never got a receipt, a filed petition, or her money back. Now the New York State Attorney General is looking into five complaints against the same organization, La Jornada, and at least 15 immigrants have needed outside help to fix the damage. Some already have deportation orders.

What if you paid $300 for an asylum application — and it was never filed? That is what Carmen Zurita says happened to her. She is one of at least five immigrants who filed sworn statements against a Queens organization called La Jornada, and the New York Attorney General's office is now reviewing those complaints.

You watch every federal court decision that touches immigration law — because one ruling can change everything. On August 11, 2026, a federal court issued a decision in Duralev v. United States. The details of what the court actually held are not yet public.

A court just issued a decision in Bangs v. Blanche — and if you are in removal proceedings or fighting a deportation order, it may already affect your case. Rulings like this one can change what arguments work in immigration court and what options remain open to you. The problem is that most immigrants only find out about relevant decisions after a deadline has already passed.

California's Attorney General issued Opinion 25-602 in August 2026, ruling that local police in the state cannot legally help ICE arrest and deport residents. For the millions of immigrants living in California — including those in removal proceedings or with pending green card applications — this opinion reshapes what local law enforcement can and cannot do. But federal agents still operate on their own, and knowing the difference could matter enormously.

Thousands of undocumented college students in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont pay in-state tuition rates — a benefit that may soon be taken away. The Department of Justice sued all three states in August 2026, calling those laws a violation of federal statute. Courts have already shut down similar laws in five other states.

The Trump administration is offering up to $300 million in federal policing grants to American cities — but the money comes with a condition: cities must actively support ICE immigration enforcement operations. For immigrants living in those cities, that could mean a sharply higher risk of arrest. The Justice Department plans to announce up to four finalist cities next month.

You filed an asylum application, and while it was pending, ICE arrested you at a routine check-in. That is exactly what happened to Gabar Choli — and what followed was eight months of force-feeding in a Texas detention center. His case is now forcing a public reckoning over what happens inside ICE detention when immigrants protest their conditions.

On July 27, 2026, Wesly Simon walked into his Brooklyn restaurant and checked USCIS's website. One alert changed everything: Haiti's Temporary Protected Status was terminated, effective that day. Nine of his employees lost their right to work in the US before the lunch rush.

ICE will finish putting body cameras on all field agents by the end of August 2026 — but the agency says it will only release footage when it decides it is "appropriate." At the same time, federal judges ended TPS protections for thousands of Burmese and South Sudanese immigrants, and ICE detained people at a Missouri rodeo after routine ID checks. This week's immigration news hits hard for people across the country.

A federal court case called Silva v. Rubio is drawing attention from immigration lawyers across the US in 2026. At its core, it is a fight over how far the government can go in deportation proceedings — and whether immigrants in removal cases are getting the due process the law requires. The outcome could affect thousands of people currently fighting to stay in the country.

You received a Notice to Appear and your immigration court hearing is weeks away. You are not sure what arguments can actually stop a removal order — and you have heard that a federal case called Liu v. Noem could change the rules. Here is what that case means for people facing deportation in 2026.

ICE agents handcuffed 23-year-old Gerson Turcios in front of his house in Rhinebeck, New York, on July 18, 2025 — after asking where he was from and photographing him. He had no criminal record. Within 24 hours, his neighbors had launched a legal defense fund, and one of the country's top deportation defense attorneys was already reviewing his case.

ICE agents are about to be on camera — all of them. Acting ICE Director David J. Venturella announced that every officer and agent in the field will carry a body-worn camera by the end of August 2026, ahead of schedule. But the bigger question for immigrants is not whether cameras exist — it is whether you can ever see the footage.

A federal rulemaking is locking in the 9-11 Biometric Fee for H-1B and L-1 petitions through at least September 2027. The fee funds the US biometric entry-exit tracking system — and missing it on a petition can get the whole filing rejected. Here is what workers and employers need to understand before the next filing.

DHS updated its immigration bond regulation on August 6, 2026. The agency removed old form numbers and outdated job titles from the rules — but made clear that no rights or procedures changed. If someone you know is facing a bond hearing in immigration court, here is what this means for them.

A court ruling in Arizona quietly landed on August 7, 2026 — and most immigrants in the state have not heard about it yet. The case, Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans v. Kristin K. Mayes, could reshape how deportation defense works at the state level. If you are in removal proceedings or facing an ICE arrest in Arizona, this decision is worth knowing about.

You filed your paperwork, showed up to every hearing, and still received a removal order. In August 2026, a federal court took up exactly that kind of fight in Leandro Spindola v. Todd Blanche — a case challenging the U.S. Attorney General over deportation proceedings. The ruling could reshape how courts handle deportation defense for people in similar situations.

You are waiting for your immigration court date, and a new federal ruling lands — one that could change how your case is handled. On August 7, 2026, a federal court issued a decision in United States v. Terry Ferguson. Immigration attorneys are now examining what it means for people in removal proceedings and beyond.

You are in removal proceedings and your next court date is coming up fast. A federal court just issued a decision in Guzman v. Blanche — and immigration attorneys say it raises important questions about how deportation cases must be handled. Here is what you need to know before you walk into that courtroom.