Immigrant·News

Inmigración en EE.UU. · Guías legales · Preguntas a abogados

Jurisprudencia

US-Born Man Sues State Dept Over Passport Denial

A federal court in Washington, DC refused in September 2026 to dismiss a lawsuit by David Amadioha, a man born in Atlanta who has been denied a US passport twice by American embassies abroad because his family changed their surname after moving to Nigeria. The US District Court ruled his APA and due process claims can proceed against Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The decision may open a federal court path for other US-born citizens abroad whose passport applications were denied over name or document mismatches.

Ayer·3 min de lectura
US-Born Man Sues State Dept Over Passport Denial

A federal court in Washington, DC refused in September 2026 to dismiss a lawsuit brought by David Nnadiotu Amadioha, a man born in Atlanta, Georgia, who has been denied a US passport twice — once in Lagos and once in Brussels. The US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that his case can move forward against Secretary of State Marco Rubio under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the law that lets people challenge unlawful government decisions in court.

What happened and why it matters

Amadioha was born in Atlanta in 1988. His family moved to Nigeria when he was a toddler and later changed their surname from "Amadioha" to "Hmadioha." He did not learn he was a US citizen until he was about 18. When he applied for a US passport at the US Embassy in Lagos in 2019, the Embassy denied it because the name on his Georgia birth certificate did not match the name on his Nigerian and Belgian documents. He applied again in Brussels in 2022, this time submitting extra evidence — including a Nigerian Embassy certificate confirming that "David Nnadiotu Amadioha" and "David Nnadiotu Hmadioha" are the same person. The Embassy denied that application too in February 2023, saying the evidence was still not enough to prove US citizenship.

Plazos de Inmigración 2026 — Gratis

Descarga el PDF con todas las fechas clave

The State Department asked the court to throw out the case, arguing that a separate law — Section 1503 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) — already gives people outside the US a way to challenge passport denials. Under that process, a person abroad must first ask a US consulate for a "certificate of identity," then travel to a US port of entry and apply for admission — while being subject to immigration detention. The court rejected that argument. Judge Loren AliKhan found that this alternative process is too burdensome, expensive, and uncertain to count as an "adequate" substitute for APA review. The court also allowed Amadioha's Fifth Amendment due process claim to proceed.

This ruling matters beyond Amadioha's case. Many US citizens born abroad to immigrant families face similar problems: name changes, clerical errors in foreign documents, or records that simply do not match. The court's decision signals that people in this situation may be able to sue the State Department directly in federal court rather than being forced through the difficult INA Section 1503 process — which can include detention at the border.

What to do

  • If the State Department denied your passport application because of a name discrepancy or document mismatch, gather every piece of evidence that links your identities — court orders, affidavits, embassy letters, old photos, school records, or a "Certificate of Individuality" from your country's embassy.
  • If you are outside the US and your passport was denied, ask an immigration or citizenship attorney whether you can file an APA lawsuit in US federal court rather than going through the INA Section 1503 process, which can require traveling to a US port of entry and risking detention.
  • Keep copies of every denial letter from the State Department. Courts look at the exact language the agency used to explain the denial — those letters are key evidence.
  • Do not assume a second denial is final. Amadioha's case shows that federal courts can review these decisions, and the government's motion to dismiss was denied.

Related: our step-by-step guide — “Immigration Court Rulings”.

Consejo del abogado
Илья Фишкин — иммиграционный адвокат
Ilya Fishkin

Abogado de inmigración, 20+ años de experiencia

Fishkin Law Firm, New York

This ruling is significant for US citizens abroad who face passport denials based on name changes or document inconsistencies. The court confirmed that the INA Section 1503 alternative — requiring travel to a US port of entry with the risk of immigration detention — is not an adequate substitute for APA review, meaning federal courts can hear these cases directly. If you are in this situation, preserve every denial letter and supporting document, because courts evaluate the agency's stated reasons carefully. Consult a citizenship or immigration attorney before attempting the Section 1503 process on your own.

Más sobre el experto →

Obtenga una consulta con un abogado de inmigración

0/2000

El envío de este formulario no crea una relación abogado–cliente. Su solicitud se envía a un abogado de inmigración con licencia para contactarle.

Sección:Jurisprudencia
Compartir:

Plazos de Inmigración 2026 — Gratis

Descarga el PDF con todas las fechas clave

Lea también
Página #article-us-born-man-sues-state-department-passport-denial-citizenship